Liberal Arts in Russia EN-rus logo
russian flagRussian
ISSN 2305-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2312-6442 (Online)
Current Issue
Поиск
2024
No. 1
2023
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2022
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2021
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2020
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2019
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2018
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2017
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2016
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2015
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2014
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2013
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2012
No. 1

Dialogicity in a literary text (on the material of modern English prose)

Liberal Arts in Russia. 2023. Vol. 12. No. 2. Pp. 121-128.
Get the full text (Russian)
License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
https://doi.org/10.15643/libartrus-2023.2.5
Semendyaeva Yu. Yu.
Ufa University of Science and Technology, Sterlitamak branch
49 Lenin Avenue, 453103 Sterlitamak, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia
Email: y.y.semendyaeva@struust.ru

Abstract

The article deals with the concept of a category and in particular the category of dialogicity in the texts of modern literary prose. For this purpose, various types of speech are analyzed: the author’s speech, the speech of characters and the inner speech of characters, which play an important role in expressing dialogicity in a literary text. The purpose of this research is to study the problem of dialogism and ways to implement it in modern English literary prose. The object of the research is dialogical speech in the broadest sense used in a literary text. The subject of the research is the linguistic means that are used in various types of artistic speech: in the author’s speech, the speech of characters and the inner speech of persons acting in novels, acting as areas of application of linguistic means of dialogicity. The author also pays attention to the implicit and explicit types of dialogue and their linguistic features (syntactic (question-answer complexes, interrogative sentences containing a direct question, incomplete, exclamatory and imperative sentences, sentences that include affirmation or negation, as well as sentences that include inversion and insertions), morphological (personal and possessive pronouns, first-person plural verbs, interjections expressing strong feelings or sudden emotions of characters, conjunctions with an adversative and alternative meaning, modal words that have the meaning of opportunity and necessity), lexical units (words with the opposite evaluative orientation, adjectives denoting evaluation) and stylistic devices (allusions, aphorisms, repetitions)). The conclusions of the study of the representation of the category of dialogicity, obtained as a result of studying the works “Life after Life”, “After You”, “The Fault in Our Stars” by modern English writers Kate Atkinson, JoJo Moyes and John Green, are presented.

Keywords

  • • literary text
  • • dialogicity
  • • explicit dialogue
  • • implicit dialogue
  • • prose
  • • linguistic means

References

  1. Tkachenko I. G., Murka Yu. G. Podkhody k traktovke teksta i khudozhestvennogo kontsepta v sovremennoi lingvistike. Saint Petersburg: Renome, 2012.
  2. Torunova N. I. Pedagogicheskii IMIDZh. 2016. No. 2(31). Pp. 54-61.
  3. Tayupova O. I., Zhabbarova F. U. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013. No. 20(311). Pp. 98-100.
  4. Bolotnova N. S. Filologicheskii analiz teksta. Moscow: Flinta, 2009.
  5. Babenko L. G., Kazarin Yu. V. Filologicheskii analiz teksta: praktikum. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt, 2016.
  6. Ivanova M. E. Natsional'naya assotsiatsiya uchenykh. 2015. No. 1(6). Pp. 31-32.
  7. Zhuravlev I. V. Voprosy psikholingvistiki. 2020. Pp. 16-26.
  8. Bakhtin M. M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo. Moscow: Eksmo, 2017.
  9. Lenkova T. A. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. 2011. No. 1. Pp. 134-139.
  10. D'yachenko M. P. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. 2012. No. 1. Pp. 245-247.
  11. Uspenskii B. A. Ego Eoguens: Yazyk i kommunikativnoe prostranstvo. Moscow: Rossiisk. gos. gumanit. un-t, 2007. Pp. 320.
  12. Lakerbai D. L. Vestnik Ivanovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2020. No. 1. Pp. 22-33.
  13. Fritz G. Handbuch der Dialoganalyse. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2013.
  14. Tayupova O. I. Doklady Bashkirskogo universiteta. 2017. Vol. 2. No. 2. Pp. 241-245.
  15. Takhtarova S. S., Pavlov D. V. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta. 2022. Vol. 27. No. 1. Pp. 150-155.
  16. Pavlov D. V. Rechevoi portret kak sredstvo sozdaniya obraza geroev (na materiale proizvedenii Entoni Berdzhessa): avtoref. ... dis. kand. nauk, 2022.
  17. Shchebel'skaya E. G., Grudina M. V. Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya. 2019. No. 2(75). Pp. 545-547.
  18. Vinokur T. G. Govoryashchii i slushayushchii: Varianty rechevogo povedeniya. Moscow: URSS, 2017.
  19. Plekhanova T. F. Diskurs-analiz teksta. Minsk: TetraSistems, 2011.
  20. Sternin I. A. Ponimanie v kommunikatsii: Chelovek v informatsionnom prostranstve. 2012. Vol. 2. Pp. 270-272.
  21. Green J. The Fault in Our Stars. London: Penguin, 2015.
  22. Duskaeva L. R. Dialogichnost' pis'mennoi rechi. SPbGU, Filol. fakul'tet, 2012.
  23. Skorik K. V. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A. S. Pushkina. 2012. Vol. 7. No. 1. Pp. 121-126.
  24. Moyes J. J. After You. London: Penguin, 2016.
  25. Atkinson K. Life after Life. London: Transworld, 2015.

© 2014-2023 Liberal Arts in Russia