Online Review Form

Title *
Authors *
reg. No. *
Select Section
Criteria of quality
Does the title clearly describe the article?   Yes
  —
  No
Does abstract reflect the content of the article correctly?   Yes
  —
  No
Are the keywords correct?   Yes
  —
  No
The relevance of scientific problem is well justified?   Yes
  —
  No
Is the research topical?   Yes
  —
  No
Does the manuscript analyze recent works?   Yes
  —
  No
What percentage of references at sources that were published last 10 years?
Is scientific problem stated correctly?   Yes
  —
  No
Whether the results of the research are of scientific interest as a whole?   Yes
  —
  No
Is there scientific novelty in the research?   Yes
  —
  No
Are the conclusions correct?   Yes
  —
  No
Were known or author’s own methods used correctly in the research?   Yes
  —
  No
Were there any mistakes in the used methods?   Yes
  —
  No
Are the data obtained in the experiments correctly interpreted?   Yes
  —
  No
Are the illustrative materials and the results of the experiment given in a proper form?   Yes
  —
  No
Are there any grammatical errors in the article?   Yes
  —
  No
Conclusion
Whether the article suits scientific type and standards of the journal?   Yes
  —
  No
Whether does the article suit the section of the journal it is submitted (section defined by the author)?   Yes
  —
  No
Conclusion: *   Whether article can be published without scientific editing or it requires correction?
  Whether the article requires to be corrected by the author?
  Whether the article requires to pass additional reviewing (after correction)?
  Whether the article can be published at all?
Flaws of the article that require correction or reasons for refusal (check the proper variants):
  The described facts, phenomena, theory are already known;
  There are mistakes in the methods, calculations, theory, experiments;
  The conclusions do not follow from the described facts;
  The article contains the details of already described phenomena or regularities;
  There are mistakes or haziness in the pictures or illustrations;
  The list of references is improperly issued or requires to be supplemented ;
  Although the material of the article is correct, it contains no information of interest for a wide audience;
  The article does not suit the type of the journal (it is a political, journalistic, etc.) and it should be sent another journal (please, specify the journal).
Notes
Signature Code *
reCAPTCHA

Online Review Form

Criteria of quality

Conclusion