Liberal Arts in Russia EN-rus logo
russian flagRussian
ISSN 2305-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2312-6442 (Online)
Current Issue
Поиск
2024
No. 1
2023
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2022
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2021
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2020
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2019
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2018
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2017
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2016
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2015
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2014
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2013
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2012
No. 1

The civilization ways of Homo Technologicus: the delicacy of existential situations

Liberal Arts in Russia. 2019. Vol. 8. No. 3. Pp. 165-183.
Get the full text (Russian)
License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
https://doi.org/10.15643/libartrus-2019.3.1
Ilyin V. V.
National research center “Kurchatov Institute”
1 Akademik Kurchatov Square, 132182 Moscow, Russia
Email: vvilin@yandex.ru

Abstract

The way of being becomes amelioration in the face of all-encompassing, all-pervading design, programming, and production using the powerful, creative potential of NBICS. Conceptually, a more energetic interpretation of the image of design, programming, and production as a tool for replacing natural-historical morphogenesis allows us to rely on an extremely useful category of autopoesis, which in the lexicon of technoscience sets off the ability to produce material forms from its own design capabilities: nano-bio-info-cogno assembly with application in socio. The technoscientific autopoiesis is the source for the process of “supernatural” innovative morphogenesis operating in the mode of self-flowing irrigative generation of human reality. Is the balance of techno-humanitarian is basically justifiable in a situation where everything becomes technology and technology becomes everything? In its ultimate formulation, the problem is recognized as the acquisition of additional guarantees of blocking uncertainties due to the introduction of technological (artificial) innovations into natural substance. Especially against the background of actively promoted enhancement technologies.

Keywords

  • • technoscience
  • • instrumental mind
  • • social reception of convergent technologies

References

  1. Baksanskii O. E., Kucher E. N. Virtualistika.
  2. Budanov V. G. NBIKS: Nauka. Tekhnologii. 2017. Vol. 2. No. 2.
  3. Gurevich P. S. Istoriya i filosofiya nauki. Moscow, 2018.
  4. Davis E. Tekhnognozis: mif, magiya i mistitsizm v informatsionnuyu epokhu [Techgnosis: myth, magic mysticism in the age of information]. Ekaterinburg: Ul'tra. Kul'tura, 2008.
  5. Il'in V. V., Akhiezer A. S. Rossiiskaya tsivilizatsiya: soderzhanie, granitsy, vozmozhnosti [Russian civilization: content, boundaries, opportunities]. Moscow: Izd-vo Moskovskogo universiteta, 2000.
  6. Castells M. Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo, kul'tura [The information age: economy, society and culture]. Moscow: GU VShE, 2000.
  7. Curie P. Izbrannye Trudy [Selected Works]. Moscow: Nauka, 1966.
  8. Latour B. Novogo vremeni ne bylo. Esse po simmetrichnoi antropologii [We have never been modern. Essay on symmetrical anthropology]. Saint Petersburg: Izd-vo Evrop. un-ta v S.-Peterburge, 2006.
  9. Paster L. Izbrannye trudy v 2 t. [Selected works in 2 volumes]. Moscow: AN SSSR, 1960. Vol. 1.
  10. Trotsky L. D. Literatura i revolyutsiya [Literature and revolution]. Moscow: Politizdat, 1991.
  11. Urmantsev Yu. A. Simmetriya prirody i priroda simmetrii [Symmetry of nature and the nature of symmetry]. Moscow: Mysl', 1974.
  12. Fromm E. Begstvo ot svobody [Escape from freedom]. Moscow: Progress, 1990.
  13. Shopenhauer A. Maloe sobranie sochinenii [Collected works]. Saint Petersburg: Azbuka-Attikus, 2015.
  14. Einstein A. Sobranie nauchnykh trudov [Collection of scientific works]. Moscow: Nauka, 1967. Vol. 4.
  15. Yakovets Yu. V. Epokhal'nye innovatsii XXI veka [Epochal innovations of the 21st century]. Moscow: Ekonomika, 2004.
  16. Fletcher J. The Ethics of Genetic Control: Ending Reproductive Roulette. Prometheus Books, 1998.
  17. Emerging Science and Technology priorities in public research policies in the EU, US and Japan. Scientific and technological foresight. March 2006.
  18. Rudenskii O. V., Rybak O. P. Informatsionno-analiticheskii byulleten' TsISN. 2010. No. 3. Pp. 3-87.
  19. Glenn L. M. The Physiologist. 2003. October. Vol. 46. No. 5.
  20. Hawking S. The Guardian. 2016. December 1.
  21. Hirooka M. Innovation Dynamism and Economic Growth. A. Nonlinear Perspective. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2006.
  22. Kreb H. Medizinische Ethik. Stuttgart, 2009.
  23. Nanoethics (the ethical and social implication of nanotechnology). Wiley, 2007. Pp. 1.
  24. The Global Technology Revolution 2020. Bio/Nano/Materials/Information Trends, Drivers, Barriers and Social Implications. Prepared for the National Intelligence Council. Rand Corp., 2006.
  25. Warwick K., Gasson M., Hutt B., Goodnew J., Kyberd P., Andrews B., Teddy P., Shad A. Archives of Neurology. 2003. Vol. 60. No. 10.

© 2014-2023 Liberal Arts in Russia