Liberal Arts in Russia EN-rus logo
russian flagRussian
ISSN 2305-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2312-6442 (Online)
Current Issue
Поиск
2024
No. 1
2023
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2022
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2021
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2020
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2019
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2018
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2017
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2016
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2015
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2014
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2013
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2012
No. 1

On the problem of updating of the social and philosophical parameters in the studies of the law and dynamic legal processes

Liberal Arts in Russia. 2016. Vol. 5. No. 5. Pp. 454-465.
Get the full text (Russian)
License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
https://doi.org/10.15643/libartrus-2016.5.3
Trofimov V. V.
Tambov State University named after G. R. Derzhavin
33 Internatsionalnaya St. 392000 Tambov, Russia
Email: iptgutv@mail.ru
Sviridov V. V.
Tambov State University named after G. R. Derzhavin
33 Internatsionalnaya St. 392000 Tambov, Russia

Abstract

In the article, the problem of socio-philosophical bases (parameters) in the studies of the law and dynamic legal processes is discussed and described. The importance of socio-philosophical level of methodology for law understanding is stated. The idea of updating the required social and philosophical foundations of legal research is held. This thesis against the background of the famous comparison of innovations in the understanding of the essence of social development with the previously prevailing in the domestic science historical materialistic approach is justified. Taking into account some of the dignity of historical materialism, the inability to use it to reveal the deeper side of the social reality of law is asserted. According to the authors, the heuristic potential for an integrated and comprehensive study of the social patterns of legal phenomena is found in the socio-philosophical approach, where the focus is on the phenomenon of “interaction” as the basis of the maximum social foundation of rights. As a possible source of scientific understanding of the issues under consideration, the national (P. A. Sorokin, K. M. Takhtaryov, N. I. Karev, A. S. Zvonitskaya, M. M. Kovalevskiy and others) and foreign sociological theories of classical scholars (T. Parsons, N. Luhmann, U. Habermas, K.-O. Apel, P. Berger, T. Luckmann and others) are specified. The formation of the right, law-making, the implementation of the right, legal corresponding connections, and other dynamic processes of law is the result of the set of interactions between social actors, integrated into the legal sphere, and in these interactive links, social laws of the existence of the right should be researched.

Keywords

  • • law
  • • dynamic processes of law
  • • formation of law
  • • socio-philosophical approach
  • • law studies
  • • society
  • • social relationships
  • • reciprocal action
  • • interaction
  • • communication
  • • socio-philosophical theory

References

  1. Syrykh V. M. Istoriya i metodologiya yuridicheskoi nauki: uchebnik [History and methodology of legal science: textbook]. Moscow: Norma, 2012.
  2. Alekseev S. S. Obshchaya teoriya sotsialisticheskogo prava: Kurs lektsii: Uchebnoe posobie: V 4-kh vyp. Vyp. IV: Primenenie prava; Nauka prava [The general theory of socialist law: Lectures: Textbook: In 4 vol. Vol. IV: Application of law; Legal science]. Sverdlovsk, 1966.
  3. Kistyakovskii B. A. Filosofiya i sotsiologiya prava [Philosophy and sociology of law]. Saint Petersburg: Izd-vo Rus. Khrist. Gumanit. in-ta, 1998.
  4. Trubetskoi E. N. Trudy po filosofii prava [Works on the philosophy of law]. Saint Petersburg: Izd-vo Rus. Khristiansk. gumanit. in-ta, 2001.
  5. Trofimov V. V. Pravoobrazovanie v sovremennom obshchestve: teoretiko-metodologicheskii aspekt: dis. ... d-ra. yurid. nauk. Saint Petersburg, 2011.
  6. Sagatovskii V. N. Sotsial'no-politicheskii zhurnal. 1994. No. 3-6. Pp. 55-70.
  7. Sorokin P. A. M. M. Kovalevskii v istorii rossiiskoi sotsiologii i obshchestvennoi mysli. Saint Petersburg: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. universiteta, 1996.
  8. Demidov A. I. Pravovedenie. 2001. No. 4. Pp. 14-22.
  9. Baskin M. P. Anglo-amerikanskaya sotsiologiya na sluzhbe imperializma [Anglo-American sociology in the service of imperialism]. Moscow: Izd-vo Akad. nauk SSSR, 1949.
  10. Bakhitov M. Sh. Ob odnoi "noveishei" sotsial'noi utopii (Kriticheskie zametki o mikrosotsiologii) [About the "newest" one social utopia (Critical notes on microsociology)]. Moscow: Sotsekgiz, 1958.
  11. Demidenko A. I. Kritika sovremennoi burzhuaznoi sotsiologii [Critique of modern bourgeois sociology]. Moscow: Izd-vo VPSh i AON, 1958.
  12. Novikov N. V. Kritika sovremennoi burzhuaznoi "nauki o sotsial'nom povedenii" [Critique of contemporary bourgeois "science of social behavior"]. Moscow: Vyssh. shkola, 1964.
  13. Zabigailo V. K. Pravo i obshchestvo: Novye problemy i metody burzhuaznogo pravovedeniya [Law and society: New problems and methods of bourgeois legal science]. Kiev: Nauk, dumka, 1981.
  14. Zivs S. L. Krizis burzhuaznoi zakonnosti v sovremennykh imperialisticheskikh gosudarstvakh [The crisis of bourgeois legality in the modern imperialist states]. Moscow: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1958.
  15. Zykov P. G. Krizis burzhuaznoi ideologii prava [The crisis of bourgeois ideology of law]. Moscow: VYuZI, 1963.
  16. Maikhofer V. Pravo i bytie. Rossiiskii ezhegodnik teorii prava. No. 1. 2008. Saint Petersburg: Yuridicheskaya kniga, 2009. Pp. 186-258.
  17. Nashits A. Pravotvorchestvo. Teoriya i zakonodatel'naya tekhnika [The lawmaking. Theory and legislative technique]. Moscow: Progress, 1974.
  18. Tumanov V. A. Tumanov V. A. Izbrannoe. Moscow: Norma: Infra-M, 2010. Pp. 63-308.
  19. Pravo i sotsiologiya [Law and sociology]. Ed. Yu. A. Tikhomirov, V. P. Kazimirchuk. Moscow: Nauka, 1973. -.
  20. Trofimov V. V. Pravovedenie. 2014. No. 2. Pp. 19-37.
  21. Kovalevskii M. M. Sochineniya. V 2-kh tt. T. II. Sovremennye sotsiologi [Works. In 2 voumes. Vol. 2. Modern sociological doctrines]. Saint Petersburg: Aleteiya, 1997.
  22. Kareev N. I. Istoriko-filosofskie i sotsiologicheskie etyudy [Historical-philosophical and sociological etudes]. Saint Petersburg: Tip. I. N. Skorokhodova, 1895.
  23. Mal'ko A. V. Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2001. No. 5. Pp. 5-13.
  24. Mal'ko A. V., Trofimov V. V. Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2010. No. 7. Pp. 5-13.
  25. Marx K., Engels F. Soch., 2 ed. [Works, 2nd edition]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 1962. Vol. 27.
  26. Parsons T. O sotsial'nykh sistemakh [On the social systems]. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt, 2002.
  27. Parsons T. O strukture sotsial'nogo deistviya [On the structure of social action]. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt, 2002.
  28. Parsons T. Teoreticheskaya sotsiologiya: Antologiya. V 2 ch. Moscow: Universitet, 2002. Pt. 2. Pp. 3-43.
  29. Boronoev A. O., Smirnov P. I. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2003. No. 8. Pp. 3-11.
  30. Khuk M. van. Pravo kak kommunikatsiya [Law as communication]. Saint Petersburg: Univer. izdat. Konsortsium, 2012.
  31. Syrykh V. M. Logicheskie osnovaniya obshchei teorii prava. Vol. 3. Sovremennoe pravoponimanie [Logical bases of the general theory of law. Vol. 3. The modern understanding of law]. Moscow: RAP, 2007.
  32. Habermas J. Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: Massachusetts, 1996.
  33. Lapin N. I. Voprosy filosofii. 2005. No. 2. Pp. 17-29.
  34. Parkhomenko R. N. Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2012. No. 4. Pp. 40-49.
  35. Polyakov A. V. Pravovedenie. 2006. No. 2. Pp. 26-43.

© 2014-2023 Liberal Arts in Russia