Liberal Arts in Russia EN-rus logo
russian flagRussian
ISSN 2305-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2312-6442 (Online)
Current Issue
Поиск
2024
No. 1
2023
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2022
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2021
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2020
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2019
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2018
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2017
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2016
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2015
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2014
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2013
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2012
No. 1

Homonymy in the context of general semantic stratification of vocabulary

Liberal Arts in Russia. 2022. Vol. 11. No. 6. Pp. 420-427.
Get the full text (Russian)
License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
https://doi.org/10.15643/libartrus-2022.6.2
Ibragimova V. L.
Ufa University of Science and Technologies
32 Zaki Validi Street, 450076 Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia
Email: ivl334@yandex.ru

Abstract

The article deals with issues related to the ambiguity of understanding the nature and place of homonymy in the vocabulary of independent language formations, with the features of the correlation of units of intralinguistic homodoublet associations, with a variety of approaches to their definition. Attention is drawn to the incorrect consideration of homodoublet formations in a line with lexico-semantic classes of units in a system of hierarchical, level-by-level differentiated integrity, which follows from the objective-linguistic principles of identifying units correlated semantically (lexico-semantic classes) and units related by the duplication of the expression plan (homonyms). The possibility of understanding the “contextual-semantic repulsion” of homonymous units in terms of system connectivity is also considered. Attention is paid to the problem of the origin of homonymy, which is reflected in the terms “homogeneous” and “heterogeneous”. Homogeneous intralinguistic homonymy is considered as the result of semantic development, consistent with the own linguistic nature of the word, the disintegration of its polysemy, perceived by native speakers as the limit of its semantic variation. Heterogeneous homonymy is characterized as a phenomenon of random coincidence of lexical units in terms of expressing their different semantics: in sound and graphic representation. The significance of the phenomenon of homonymy is primarily associated with the communicative and speech aspect of the functioning of the language.

Keywords

  • • intralingual
  • • heterogeneous
  • • homogeneous
  • • communication
  • • correlation
  • • lexical
  • • homonymy
  • • semantic
  • • connectivity
  • • level

References

  1. Abregov A. N., Melkonyan G. A. Sopostavitel'naya filolo-giya i polilingvizm: Mat-ly II Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (Kazan', 29 noyab-rya - 1 dekabrya 2005 goda). Kazan': Shkola, 2005.
  2. Akhmanova O. S. Slovar' lingvisticheskikh terminov [Dictionary of linguistic terms]. Moscow: Sovet-skaya entsiklopediya, 1969.
  3. Akhmanova O. S. Slovar' omonimov russkogo yazyka [Dictionary of homonyms of the Russian language]. Moscow: Russkii yazyk, 1986.
  4. Vinogradov V. V. Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 1968. No. 5.
  5. Vinogradov V. V. Russkii yazyk. Grammaticheskoe uchenie o slove [Russian language. Grammatical teaching about the word]. 3-e izd. Moscow: Nauka, 1986.
  6. Golovin B. N. Vvedenie v yazykoznanie [Introduction to linguistics]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1977. Pp. 102.
  7. Zadorozhnyi M. M. O granitsakh polisemii i omonimii [On the boundaries of polysemy and homonymy]. Moscow, 1971.
  8. Ibragimova V. L. Lingvisticheskii seminar: Mezhvuz. sb. nauch. st. No. 2. Sankt-Peterburg, 2001. Pp. 10-18.
  9. Krongauz M. A. Semantika [Semantics]. Moscow, 2001.
  10. Kuznetsova E. V. Voprosy metalingvistiki. Leningrad, 1963.
  11. Maslov Yu. S. Vvedenie v yazykoznanie [Introduction to linguistics]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1987. Pp. 107.
  12. Mechkovskaya N. B. Obshchee yazykoznanie. Ed. A. E. Supruna. Minsk: Vysheishaya shkola, 1983. Pp. 403.
  13. Norman B. Yu. Obshchee yazykoznanie. Ed. A. E. Supruna. Minsk: Vysheishaya shkola, 1983. Pp. 281.
  14. Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Yu. Tolkovyi slovar' russkogo yazyka [Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language]. Moscow, 2017.
  15. Plotnikov B. A. Leksikologiya. Obshchee yazykoznanie. Ed. A. E. Supruna. Minsk: Vyshei-shaya shkola, 1983. Pp. 206.
  16. Pol'sko-russkii slovar' [Polish-Russian dictionary]. Ed. M. F. Rozvadovskoi. Moscow: GIINS, 1960.
  17. Uryson E. V. Problemy issledovaniya yazykovoi kartiny mira. Analogiya v semantike [Problems of the study of the linguistic picture of the world. Analogy in semantics]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2003. Pp. 191.
  18. Fasmer M. Etimologicheskii slovar' russkogo yazyka [Etymological dictionary of the Russian language]. V 4 t. Moscow: Astrel', 2009. Vol. 2.
  19. Filin F. P. Ocherki po teorii yazykoznaniya. Moscow, 1982. Pp. 220.
  20. Shvedova N. Yu. Rusistika segodnya. Yazyk: sistema i ee funktsionirovanie. Moscow: Nauka, 1988. Pp. 155.
  21. Shmelev D. N. Bol'shoi entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. Yazykoznanie. Moscow: Bol'shaya Rossiiskaya entsiklopediya, 1998. Pp. 344-345.

© 2014-2023 Liberal Arts in Russia