Liberal Arts in Russia EN-rus logo
russian flagRussian
ISSN 2305-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2312-6442 (Online)
Current Issue
Поиск
2024
No. 1
2023
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2022
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2021
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2020
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2019
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2018
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2017
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2016
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2015
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2014
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2013
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2012
No. 1

Factors opposing the determinilogization of art criticism terms

Liberal Arts in Russia. 2022. Vol. 11. No. 3. Pp. 199-212.
Get the full text (Russian)
License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
https://doi.org/10.15643/libartrus-2022.3.5
Ivanova S. V.
Pushkin Leningrad State University
10 Peterburgskoe Highway, 196605 Pushkin, Saint Petersburg, Russia
Email: s.ivanova@lengu.ru
Dovgopiat P. E.
Saint-Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics
44A, Lermontovskii Avenue, 190103 Saint-Petersburg, Russia

Abstract

The article reveals certain aspects of determinologization in the art criticism terminology system. The novelty of the study consists in indicating the factors preventing the loss of the terminological status of art criticism terms. The objective of this work is to identify the properties that can protect the art criticism term from determinologization. In this study such linguistic methods as definitional analysis, contextual analysis, as well as elements of semasiological analysis were employed. The research material was drawn from specialized dictionaries of art history and art criticism terminology. The major difference between a word of general literary language and a term is the term belongs to the language for special purposes as it performs the function of denoting an exact scientific concept. On the other hand, art criticism terminology actively interacts with terms of other spheres of scientific knowledge, and is also often used in general literary language. For this reason, the structure and boundaries of the art criticism terminology system tend to be unstable. In the course of the study, the reasons for the determinologization of art criticism terms are singled out: in addition to the wide use of art criticism terms outside the respective system, leading to the loss of terminological meaning, as well as consubstantiality, which is hazardous for the scientific notion, one can also highlight the absence of denotation or a unit of definition different from a compatible lexical unit of general literary language. This leads to the loss of the terminological status of the overwhelming number of art criticism terms, which requires the establishment and substantiation of criteria that can protect the art history term from determinologization. As a result, the following properties of art criticism terms have been established, which are able to protect the terminological status of art criticism terms: the availability of denotation and definition, different from a non-term similar in meaning, semantic volume, accuracy, uniqueness, meaningfulness, motivation. The main factor responsible for the preservation of the terminological status could be the irreplaceability of the term in the language for special purposes which implies lack of synonyms.

Keywords

  • • term
  • • non-term
  • • determinologization
  • • art history terminology
  • • terminology
  • • terminological status

References

  1. Anisimova A. G. Tipologiya terminov angloyazychnogo iskusstvovedeniya: avtoreferat dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Moscow, 1994.
  2. Anisimova A. G., Pavlyuk M. I. Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Istoriya, pedagogika, filologiya. 2019. No. 2. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosu-ob-izmenenii-obema-znacheniya-konsubstantsionalnyh-terminov-gumanitarnyh-i-obschestvenno-politicheskih-nauk.
  3. Akhmanova O. S. Slovar' lingvisticheskikh terminov [Dictionary of linguistic terms]. 2-e izd. Moscow: Sovet-skaya entsiklopediya, 1969.
  4. Vinogradov V. V. Slovo v grammatike i slovare [Word in grammar and dictionary]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1984.
  5. Vinokur G. O. Trudy MIFLI. Filologicheskii fakul'tet. Moscow, 1939. Vol. 5. Pp. 3-54.
  6. Gapienko P. E. Diskurs professional'noi kommunikatsii. 2020. Vol. 2. No. 4. Pp. 43-62. https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2020-2-4-43-62.
  7. Gapienko P. E. Liberal Arts in Russia. 2020. No. 4. Pp. 264-270.
  8. Golovin B. N., Kobrin R. Yu. Lingvisticheskie osnovy ucheniya o terminakh [Linguistic foundations of the theory of terms]. Moscow: Vyssh. shk., 1987.
  9. Gorelova I. N., Lysenko N. N., Mukhlynkina Yu. V., Ryabova Z. A. Kul'turologiya. Kurs lektsii [Cultural studies. Lecture course]. Moscow: MIIT, 2010. Pt. 1.
  10. Grinev-Grinevich S. V. Terminovedenie [Terminology]. Moscow: Akademik, 2008.
  11. Kobrin R. Yu. NTI. Ser. 2. Inform. Protsessy i sistemy. 1981. No. 8. Pp. 7−10.
  12. Kotelova N. Z. Problematika opredelenii terminov v slovaryakh raznogo tipa. Leningrad: Nauka, Leningr. otd-nie, 1976. Pp. 30-44.
  13. Leichik V. M. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya terminologiya (nauchno-ref. sbornik). Moscow, 2001. No. 2. Pp. 54−55.
  14. Leichik V. M. Terminovedenie: predmet, metody, struktura [Terminology: subject, methods, structure]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo LKI, 2007.
  15. Lotte D. S. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR. Moscow: Nauka, 1931. Pp. 881−883.
  16. Makarova A. A. Determinologizatsiya edinits yazyka ekonomiki i biznesa v sovremennom russkom yazyke: dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Moscow: 2007.
  17. Slovar' russkogo yazyka: V 4-kh t. [Dictionary of the Russian language: In 4 volumes]. Ed. A. P. Evgen'evoi. Moscow: Rus. yaz., 1999. Vol. 1. A-I.
  18. Superanskaya A. V., Podol'skaya N. V., Vasil'eva N. V. Obshchaya terminologiya: voprosy teorii [General terminology: theoretical issues]. Moscow: Librokom, 2012.
  19. Khizhnyak S. P. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Povolzhskii region. Gumanitarnye nauki. 2014. No. 3(31). Pp. 144-150.
  20. Shurygin N. A. Leksikologicheskaya terminologiya kak sistema [Lexicological terminology as a system]. Nizhnevartovsk, 1997.
  21. Barnett L. Don't give up the day job - how artists make a living. 2010. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2010/jan/24/artists-day-jobs.
  22. Clarke M., Clarke D. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Art Terms (2 ed.). 2010. URL: https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199569925.001.0001/acref-9780199569922.
  23. Chilvers Y. The Oxford Dictionary of Art (3 ed.). 2004. DOI:10.1093/acref/9780198604761.001.0001. URL: https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198604761.001.0001/acref-9780198604761.
  24. Chilvers Y. The Oxford Dictionary of Art and Artists (5 ed.). 2015. URL: https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780191782763.001.0001/acref-9780191782763.
  25. Lucie-Smith E. The Thames and Hudzon Dictionary of Art Terms. New York, 2004. URL: https://archive.org/details/thameshudsondic00luci.
  26. Maintenance for Art Conversation. URL: https://www.mmca.go.kr/eng/contents.
  27. Merriam-Webster. URL: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ideal.
  28. Online Etymology Dictionary. URL: https://www.etymonline.com/word/perspective.
  29. The History of Perspective. URL: http://www.essentialvermeer.com/technique/perspective/history.html.
  30. Wise Sayings. URL: https://www.wisesayings.com/canvas-quotes.

© 2014-2023 Liberal Arts in Russia