Liberal Arts in Russia EN-rus logo
russian flagRussian
ISSN 2305-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2312-6442 (Online)
Current Issue
Поиск
2024
No. 1
2023
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2022
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2021
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2020
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2019
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2018
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2017
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2016
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2015
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2014
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2013
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2012
No. 1

Structural and semantic features of sports terms (on the example of ice hockey)

Liberal Arts in Russia. 2022. Vol. 11. No. 1. Pp. 58-66.
Get the full text (Russian)
License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
https://doi.org/10.15643/libartrus-2022.1.5
Kasymova O. P.
Bashkir State University
32 Zaki Validi Street, 450076 Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia
Email: olgakasymova@yandex.ru
Safikanova N. R.
Bashkir State University
32 Zaki Validi Street, 450076 Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia

Abstract

The article deals with topical issues of sports terminology, namely the term sphere “ice hockey”. The terms are analyzed from the point of view of their functioning in modern speech, which makes it possible to discover their semantic structure and ways of its development by the example of two sports terms - “шайба” (“puck”) and “клюшка” (“stick”). The semantics of words is presented as multi-layered, having a basic meaning that contains professionally significant information, and a periphery that is formed during the functioning of the word in speech. The authors come to the conclusion that the terms are part of the lexical system of the language and they have the same processes as the basic vocabulary. Contextual analysis carried out using examples from the National Corpus of the Russian language showed that at the level of phrases, visual and spatial representation of the physical properties of objects (size, weight, shape) is realized, and the appearance of additional metaphorical and metonymic meanings is also shown. Sports terms can be desemanticized by being used as onyms. The cognitive parameters of the terms considered are not equivalent. It is noted that the word “шайба” (“puck”) has a higher derivational and semantic potential than the word “клюшка” (“stick”). The terms represent not only precise professional concepts, but also modern associations and assessments of speakers.

Keywords

  • • sports discourse
  • • sports term system
  • • semantic structure of term
  • • hockey
  • • puck
  • • stick

References

  1. Gak V. G. Printsipy i metody semanticheskikh issledovanii. Moscow: Nauka, 1976. Pp. 73-92.
  2. Dzhonich V. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS. Series: Linguistics and Literature. 2004. Vol. 3. No. 1. Pp. 47-56.
  3. Dudka K. V., Saburova N. A. Uchenye zametki TOGU. 2016. Vol. 7. No. 3(2). Pp. 51-54.
  4. Zalevskaya A. A. Vvedenie v psikholingvistiku [Introduction to psycholinguistics]. Moscow: Rossiisk. gos. gumanit. un-t, 1999.
  5. Ziyangirov E. K. Semanticheskie i funktsional'no-stilisticheskie parametry sportivnogo diskursa: avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Ufa, 2017.
  6. Issledovaniya po russkoi terminologii: Sb. statei [Studies in Russian terminology: Collected works]. Ed. V. P. Danilenko. Moscow: AN SSSR, In-t rus. yaz., 1971.
  7. Kazarina S. G. Svyazi s obshchestvennost'yu v sporte: obrazovanie, tendentsii, mezhdunarodnyi opyt. 2014. No. 6. Pp. 123-128.
  8. Kasymova O. P., Safikanova O. P. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta. 2020. No. 3. Pp. 599-603.
  9. Nazarenko N. A. Strukturno-semanticheskie i funktsional'nye kharakteristiki ekonomicheskoi terminologii (v ramkakh segmenta terminosfery "rynochnaya ekonomika"): avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Stavropol', 2005.
  10. Novikov L. A. Semantika russkogo yazyka: ucheb. pos. [Semantics of the Russian language: textbook. pos]. Moscow: Vyssh. shk., 1982.
  11. Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Yu. Tolkovyi slovar' russkogo yazyka [Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language]. Moscow: Azbukovnik, 1992.
  12. Protchenko I. F. Leksika i slovoobrazovanie russkogo yazyka sovet-skoi epokhi [Vocabulary and word formation of the Russian language of the Soviet era]. Moscow, 1985.
  13. Prokhorova V. N. Russkaya terminologiya (leksiko-semanticheskoe obrazovanie) [Russian terminology (lexico-semantic formation)]. Moscow: MGU, filologicheskii fakul'tet, 1996.
  14. Rakhilina E. V. Kognitivnyi analiz predmetnykh imen: semantika i sochetaemost' [Cognitive analysis of subject names: semantics and compatibility]. Moscow: Rus. slovari, 2000.
  15. Rylov A. S. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. 2012. No. 5(1). Pp. 297-299.
  16. Simonova K. Yu., Blinov V. A., Beschetnykh A. V. Fizkul'turnoe obrazovanie Sibiri. 2020. No. 1(43). Pp. 15-18.
  17. Tayupova O. I. Liberal Arts in Russia. 2016. Vol. 5. No. 2. Pp. 212-219.
  18. Tayupova O. I. Doklady Bashkirskogo universiteta. 2018. Vol. 3. No. 1. Pp. 100-104.
  19. Terminologicheskii glossarii XXII Olimpiiskikh igr i XI Paralimpiiskikh igr 2014 g. v Sochi. Anglo-russkii slovar'. Sportivnye distsipliny: khokkei na l'du. Moscow: Orgkomitet "Sochi-14", 2012.
  20. Timofeeva N. P. Problemy sovremennoi lingvistiki v kontekste antropotsentrizma. Saratov, 2016. Pp. 47-84.
  21. Eco U. Rol' chitatelya. Issledovaniya po semiotike teksta [The role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts]. Saint Petersburg: Symposium; Moscow: prry, 2005.
  22. Natsional'nyi korpus russkogo yazyka. URL: http://www.ruscorpora.ru/.

© 2014-2023 Liberal Arts in Russia