Liberal Arts in Russia EN-rus logo
russian flagRussian
ISSN 2305-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2312-6442 (Online)
Current Issue
Поиск
2024
No. 1
2023
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2022
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2021
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2020
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2019
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2018
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2017
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2016
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2015
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2014
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2013
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2012
No. 1

The problem of state countering extremism: world and Russian experience

Liberal Arts in Russia. 2021. Vol. 10. No. 5. Pp. 330-341.
Get the full text (Russian)
License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
https://doi.org/10.15643/libartrus-2021.5.4
Borisenkov V. V.
Bashkir State University
32 Zaki Validi Street, 450076 Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia
Email: vicbor1696@gmail.com

Abstract

Extremism is one of the global problems of our time. The international community is making serious efforts to solve this problem at the state and interstate levels. An appeal to foreign and Russian experience of anti-extremist programs and organizations made it possible to reveal the main shortcomings in this area: weak coordination of elements of anti-extremist programs of different levels, contradictions between the laws regulating anti-extremist activities at the state and international levels, inconsistency in understanding the goals and objectives of the struggle at different levels of the system, the formal nature of the activities of a number of anti-extremist structures, inadequacy of measures taken against extremism, the radical nature of a number of state methods to combat extremism, provoking an escalation of tension in society. Political institutions also reveal their inconsistency with modern conditions and can be a source of tension that creates conditions for radicalization. Consistency in the organization of government measures and a combination of four directions could minimize the shortcomings. These directions imply the following: the reliance on humanism in international cooperation; the transnational nature of the continuity of legal regulation in the fight against extremism, based on the principle of extraterritoriality of the rights and freedoms of the person; the formation of anti-extremist centers; educating citizens in the spirit of mutual respect for I and the Other.

Keywords

  • • extremism
  • • state
  • • law
  • • countering extremism
  • • international cooperation

References

  1. Brückner M., Grüner H. P. Public Choice. 2020. Vol. 185. No. 1-2. Pp. 131-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00745-w.
  2. el-Ojeili C., Taylor D. Critical Sociology. 2020. Vol. 46. No. 7-8. Pp. 1141-1155. https://doi.org/10.1177/089692052/0912459.
  3. Graham M. H., Svolik M. W. American Political Science Review. 2020. Vol. 114. No. 2. Pp. 392-409. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000052.
  4. Jensen M. A., Atwell Seate A., James P. A. Terrorism and Political Violence. 2020. Vol. 32. No. 5. Pp. 1067-1090. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1442330.
  5. Pavlović T., Wertag A. Personality and Individual Differences. 2021. Vol. 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110374.
  6. van Prooijen J.-W., Kuijper S. M. Personality and Individual Differences. 2020. Vol. 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109888.
  7. Vergani M., Iqbal M., Ilbahar E., Barton G. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism. 2020. Vol. 43. No. 10. Pp. 854. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2018.1505686.
  8. Arjona-Pelado I., Atnashev V. Proceedings of Topical Issues in International Political Geography. Cham: Springer, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58263-0_2.
  9. Golec de Zavala A., Lantos D. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2020. Vol. 29. No. 3. Pp. 273-278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420917703.
  10. Jasko K., Webber D., Kruglanski A. W., Gelfand M. Journal of personality and social psychology. 2020. Vol. 118. No. 6. Pp. 1165-1187. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000198.
  11. Kavanagh C. M., Kapitány R., Putra I. E., Whitehouse H. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020. Vol. 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01172.
  12. Posłuszna E. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2020. Vol. 12. No. 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166536.
  13. Skoczylis J., Andrews S. Critical Social Policy. 2020. Vol. 40. No. 3. Pp. 350-369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018319840145.
  14. Ozer S. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2020. Vol. 76. Pp. 26-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.02.007.
  15. Kyaw N. N. Asian Journal of Law and Society. 2021. Vol. 8. No. 1. Pp. 108-131. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2020.50.
  16. Onapajo H., Ozden K. Security Journal. 2020. Vol. 33. No. 3. Pp. 476-492. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-020-00238-2.
  17. Omenma J. T., Onyango M. India Quarterly. 2020. Vol. 76. No. 1. Pp. 103-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974928419901197.
  18. Rieger D., Frischlich L., Bente G. Media, War and Conflict. 2020. Vol. 13. No. 3. Pp. 280-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635219829165.
  19. Chaney P., Sahoo S. Journal of Civil Society. 2020. Vol. 16. No. 3. Pp. 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2020.1787629.
  20. Glušac L. Journal of Regional Security. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 1. Pp. 39-74. https://doi.org/10.5937/jrs15-24025.
  21. Harris-Hogan S. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 2. Pp. 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2020.1769852.
  22. Lemon E., Antonov O. Democratization. 2020. Vol. 27. No. 7. Pp. 1221-1239. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1778671.
  23. Riedel R. Ecclesiastical Law Journal. 2021. Vol. 23. No. 3. Pp. 280-293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956618X21000363.
  24. Aziz S. F., Beydoun K. A. Boston University Law Review. 2020. Vol. 100. No. 3. Pp. 1151-1191.
  25. Fomenko A., Marchenko E., Sydorov O., Zhuravlov D. Economic Annals-XXI. 2020. Vol. 181. No. 1-2. Pp. 28-43. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V181-03.
  26. Hoffman A. J. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community. 2020. Vol. 48. No. 3. Pp. 207-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2019.1625606.
  27. Ozer S., Bertelsen P. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 2020. Vol. 61. No. 5. Pp. 642-651. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12636.
  28. Skiple A. Young. 2020. Vol. 28. No. 4. Pp. 422-438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308820914828.
  29. Sjøen M. M., Mattsson C. Critical Studies on Terrorism. 2020. Vol. 13. No. 2. Pp. 218-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2019.1693326.
  30. Weert A. v. d., Eijkman Q. A. Crime, Law and Social Change. 2020. Vol. 73. No. 5. Pp. 491-507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-019-09877-y.
  31. Karpova A. Yu., Savel'ev A. O., Vil'nin A. D., Chaikovskii D. V. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny. 2020. No. 3. Pp. 159-181. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.3.1585.
  32. Il'in V. V. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofskie nauki. 2019. No. 1. Pp. 136-147. https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7227-2019-1-136-147.
  33. Shaban H. Philosophy and Social Criticism. 2020. Vol. 46. No. 5. Pp. 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453720916905.
  34. Nazarov V. Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo evraziiskikh gosudarstv: filosofiya, politika, ekonomika, pravo. 2015. No. 3. Pp. 7-16.
  35. Annenkov A. Izvestiya TGU. 2017. No. 3-2. Pp. 52-60.
  36. Lombroso Ch. Genial'nost' i pomeshatel'stvo: bezumstvo geniev [Genius and madness]. Moscow: AST, 2019.
  37. Lombroso Ch. Chelovek prestupnyi [Criminal man]. Moscow: Algoritm, 2018.
  38. Baudrillard J. Matritsa Apokalipsisa. Poslednii zakat Evropy [Matrix of the Apocalypse. The last sunset of Europe]. Moscow: Rodina, 2019.
  39. Sysoev A. Lichnost' ekstremista [The personality of an extremist]. Moscow: PER SE, 2008.
  40. Glava OON ochertil chetyre napravleniya bor'by s ekstremizmom i terrorizmom. URL: http://www.unic.ru/event/2015-02-19/v-mire/glava-oon-ochertil-chetyre-napravleniya-borby-s-ekstremizmom-i-terrorizmom.
  41. Korotich S. Moment istiny dlya ARF. URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/blogs/dvfu/32176/.
  42. Budaeva S., Degtyareva N. Vestnik Zabaikal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2014. No. 4.
  43. Vlasov A. ShOS i strategii bezopasnosti v Tsentral'no-Aziat-skom regione: problemy i perspektivy. URL: https://ia-centr.ru/experts/iats-mgu/shos-i-strategii-bezopasnosti-v-tsentralno-aziatskom-regione-problemy-i-perspektivy.
  44. Kol'tyukov A. Shankhaiskaya organizatsiya sotrudnichestva: k novym rubezham razvitiya. Moscow: Institut Dal'nego Vostoka RAN, 2008.
  45. Natsional'nyi antiterroristicheskii komitet. Tseli i zadachi. URL: http://nac.gov.ru/nak/celi-i-zadachi.html.
  46. Pokazateli prestupnosti Rossii. Dinamika. URL: http://crimestat.ru/offenses_chart.
  47. Lemon E., Antonov O. Democratization. 2020. Vol. 27. No. 7. Pp. 1221-1239.

© 2014-2023 Liberal Arts in Russia