Liberal Arts in Russia EN-rus logo
russian flagRussian
ISSN 2305-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2312-6442 (Online)
Current Issue
Поиск
2024
No. 1
2023
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2022
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2021
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2020
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2019
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2018
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2017
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2016
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2015
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2014
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2013
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2012
No. 1

Constituents of the microfield of equality of the functional-semantic category of comparability in the Yakut language

Liberal Arts in Russia. 2020. Vol. 9. No. 4. Pp. 256-263.
Get the full text (Russian)
License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
https://doi.org/10.15643/libartrus-2020.4.5
Kharabaeva V. I.
Institute of Humanities Research and Indigenous Studies of the North, Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch
1 Petrovsky Street, 677027 Yakutsk, Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), Russia
Email: stabilo.83@mail.ru

Abstract

The article is devoted to the features of functioning of the components of the microfield “equality” in the functional-semantic category of comparativity in the Yakut language. Comparison is a logical action, the purpose of which is to compare two components that are homogeneous in nature for a deeper understanding of the essence of one of them. In modern linguistics, the result of the comparison, i.e. the revealed similarity/distinction between things (objects, thing, phenomena), is combined under the term comparability. Within the category of comparativity, there is a microsystem of means serving for expression of value of equality. The microfield of equality of the category of comparativity is characterized by the expression of similarity of signs of objects and phenomena of reality. This article reveals the specifics of the functioning of comparative constructions with standards of comparison containing postpositions kurduk ʽlikeʼ, keriete ʽword’, tene ʽlikeʼ, saҕa ʽsizeʼ. Attention is paid to the distinction between real and unreal comparison. Two types of unreal comparison are considered in the paper: irreality in a complex sentence and irreality in a simple sentence. In a complex sentence, which describes disjoint situations, the first is understood as a real situation, the second as its entirely fictional image, which must be correlated with the first representation. In a simple sentence, irreality is based on the imagination of the author.

Keywords

  • • Yakut language
  • • semantic category of comparativity
  • • microfield of equality
  • • comparative constructions
  • • real and unreal comparison
  • • complex sentence

References

  1. Bondarko A. B. Grammaticheskaya kategoriya i kontekst [Grammatical category and context]. Leningrad: Nauka, 1971.
  2. Bubnova M. S. Grammatiko-stilisticheskaya kharakteristika slozhnopodchinennykh predlozhenii s pridatochnymi irreal'nogo sravneniya v sovremennom nemetskom yazyke: dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Moscow, 1978.
  3. Vasil'ev Yu. I. Sposoby vyrazheniya sravneniya v yakut-skom yazyke [Ways of expressing comparison in the Yakut language]. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1986.
  4. Gulyga E. V., Shendel's E. I. Grammatiko-leksicheskie polya v sovremennom nemetskom yazyke [Grammar-lexical fields in modern German language]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1969.
  5. Gurbanov X. M. Pridatochnye sravnitel'nye predlozheniya v sovremennom angliiskom yazyke: dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Chardzhou, 1988.
  6. Ivanova C. B. Strukturno-semanticheskie osobennosti pridatochnykh sravneniya i ikh funktsionirovanie v tekste: dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Moscow, 1988.
  7. Kazantseva I. V. Funktsional'no-semanticheskoe pole komparativnosti v mariiskom literaturnom yazyke: dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Ioshkar-Ola, 2005.
  8. Krylova M. N. Yazyk i kul'tura. 2013. No. 3(23). Pp. 56-63.
  9. Krylova M. N. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya "Filologicheskie nauki. Yazykoznanie". 2014. No. 8. Pp. 124-131.
  10. Malykh L. M. Vestnik Udmurt-skogo universiteta. 2012. No. 5-2. Pp. 83-91.
  11. Nazaryan V. O. Sopostavitel'nyi analiz slozhnopodchinennykh predlozhenii sravneniya v nemetskom i angliiskom yazykakh: avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Moscow, 1992.
  12. Nikolaeva A. V. Funktsional'no-semanticheskoe pole komparativnosti v sovremennom angliiskom yazyke: dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Rostov n/D, 2002.
  13. Novikova E. V. Etalony sravneniya v nemetskoi kartine mira: dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Omsk, 2003.
  14. Porksheyan E. M. Yazykovye edinitsy v semanticheskom aspekte. Taganrog: izd-vo Taganrogsk. ped. in-ta, 1990. Pp. 91-99.
  15. Rudnev A. G. Sintaksis sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Syntax of modern Russian language]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1963.
  16. Rumyantseva M. V. Tipologicheskie osobennosti komparativnykh konstruktsii (na materiale russkogo i nemetskogo yazykov): dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Chelyabinsk, 2007.
  17. Cheremisina M. I. Sravnitel'nye konstruktsii sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Comparative constructions of the modern Russian language]. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1976.
  18. Cherkasova E. T. Perekhod polnoznachnykh slov v predlogi [Transition of notional words to prepositions]. Moscow: Nauka, 1967.
  19. Chumachenko E. S. Yazyk. Slovesnost'. Kul'tura. 2013. No. 6. Pp. 31-46.
  20. Fenin Yu. Ustoichivye sravneniya, kharakteriziruyushchie litso cheloveka v russkoi yazykovoi kartine mira (na fone kitaiskogo yazyka): dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Saint Petersburg, 2016.

© 2014-2023 Liberal Arts in Russia