Liberal Arts in Russia EN-rus logo
russian flagRussian
ISSN 2305-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2312-6442 (Online)
Current Issue
Поиск
2024
No. 1
2023
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2022
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2021
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2020
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2019
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2018
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2017
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2016
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2015
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2014
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2013
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2012
No. 1

Universal terms within the global educational area and strategies of their translation (interpretation) from English into Russian

Liberal Arts in Russia. 2020. Vol. 9. No. 4. Pp. 233-245.
Get the full text (Russian)
License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
https://doi.org/10.15643/libartrus-2020.4.3
Lukmanova R. R.
Bashkir State University
32 Zaki Validi Street, 450076 Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia
Email: renata89373319690@gmail.com
Belova Ju. A.
Bashkir State University
32 Zaki Validi Street, 450076 Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia

Abstract

The article is aimed at English HEI terms and the ways of their interpretation (translation) into Russian. It is carried out with the help of the forwarded experiment for selecting translation equivalents and comparative English-Russian translation analysis. The research is based on the texts of qualitative scientific and methodological journals and official documents of higher education in Russia, Europe, and Asia. 90 terms of education sphere were taken from the texts above and applied to carry out the following experiment. The study employed various translations of English stimulus language units (metaterms) made by two focus-groups to verify the findings. The first group comprised students of Bashkir State University (with the Russian language as a native one) who study English as bachelors (Applied linguistics and practice and theory of translation) with intermediate and upper-intermediate English level. The second group included professional translators with advanced level of the English language knowledge. The respondents performed the English-Russian translation of 90 metaterms without reference to any manuals or on-line dictionaries. They encountered some difficulties that are proposed to be solved with the help of interpretation strategies, namely, semanticized, linguistic and cultural, and cognitive ones. The strategies contribute to the necessary and sufficient information accumulation and lead to comprehending the term meaning at different levels, thus helping the translator to cope with the challenging task of term translation and interpretation. Consequently, semantic and formal adequacy of translation is achieved.

Keywords

  • • term
  • • higher education sphere
  • • forwarded experiment for selecting translation equivalents
  • • semanticized interpretation strategy
  • • linguistic and cultural interpretation strategy
  • • cognitive interpretation strategy

References

  1. Baranov A. N. Vvedenie v prikladnuyu lingvistiku: Uchebnoe posobie [Introduction to applied linguistics: textbook]. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2003.
  2. Barkhudarov L. S. Yazyk i perevod. Voprosy obshchei i chastnoi teorii perevoda [Language and translation. Questions of general and specific translation theory]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1975.
  3. Belova Yu. A. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta. 2010. Vol. 15. No. 1. Pp. 120-124.
  4. Grinev-Grinevich S. V. Terminovedenie [Science of terminology]. Moscow: Akademiya, 2008.
  5. Dyukarev I. A., Kotlobovskii I. B., Karavaeva E. V., Demchuk A. L., Teleshova I. G., Echenike V. Kh., Ul'yanova M. E. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2013. No. 8-9. Pp. 78-87.
  6. Zagorovskaya O. V. Termin i terminologiya [Term and terminology]. Voronezh: Nauchnaya kniga, 2011.
  7. Komissarov V. N. Teoriya perevoda (lingvisticheskie aspekty) [Translation theory (linguistic aspects)]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1990.
  8. Lantyukhova N. N., Zagorovskaya O. V., Litvinova T. A. Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta GPS MChS Rossii. 2013. No. 1(6). Pp. 42-45.
  9. Latyshev L. K. Perevod: problemy teorii, praktiki i metodiki prepodavaniya [Translation: problems of theory, practice, and teaching methods]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1988.
  10. Leichik V. M. Terminovedenie: predmet, metody, struktura [Science of terminology: subject, methods, structure]. Moscow: Izd-vo LKI, 2007.
  11. Lukmanova R. R., Grigor'eva T. V., Rodionova S. E., Belova Yu. A. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta. 2019. Vol. 24. No. 3. Pp. 759-766.
  12. Lukmanova R. R., Utrobina A. A. Mat-ly V Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi 100-letiyu obrazovaniya Respubliki Bashkortostan, 110-letiyu sozdaniya Bashkirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta i 10-letiyu sozdaniya Regional'noi obshchestvennoi organizatsii "Obshchestvo druzhby Bashkortostan - Bolgariya". Ufa, 24-25 oktyabrya 2019 g. Pp. 138-144.
  13. Lukmanova R. R., Chusova K. V. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta. 2017. Vol. 22. No. 4. Pp. 1058-1061.
  14. Morozkina E. A. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta. 2012. Vol. 17. No. 1. Pp. 154-157.
  15. Polozhenie o Modul'no-reitingovoi sisteme otsenki uspevaemosti studentov BashGU. URL: http://www.bashedu.ru/umu/o-modulno-reitingovoi-sisteme-obucheniya-i-otsenki-uspevaemosti-studentov.
  16. Prokhorov V. A. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rssii. 2018. Vol. 27. No. 1. Pp. 31-37.
  17. Revzin I. I., Rozentsveig V. Yu. Osnovy obshchego i mashinnogo perevoda [Basics of general and machine translation]. M: Vysshaya shkola, 1964.
  18. Reformat-skii A. A. Vvedenie v yazykovedenie [Introduction to linguistics]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1967.
  19. Retsker I. Ya. Teoriya perevoda i perevodcheskaya praktika [Translation theory and practice of interpreting]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1974.
  20. Superanskaya A. V. Obshchaya terminologiya: voprosy teorii [General terminology: theoretical questions]. Moscow: Librokom, 2012.
  21. Ter-Minasova S. G. Yazyk i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya [Language and intercultural communication]. Moscow: Slovo, 2000.
  22. Fedorov A. B. Osnovy obshchei teorii perevoda [Basics of general translation theory]. Saint Petersburg: Filologicheskii fakul'tet SPbGU, 2002.
  23. Shelov S. D. Termin. Terminologichnost'. Terminologicheskie opredeleniya [Term. Termhood. Terminological definitions]. Saint Petersburg: Filologicheskii fakul'tet SPbGU, 2003.
  24. Yanova E. A. Vestnik Moskovskoi mezhdunarodnoi akademii. Pp. 112-114. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kvazibesperevodnoy-metod-peredachi-ekonomicheskih-terminov-kak-rasprostranennyy-priem-perevoda/viewer.
  25. Catford J. C. A linguistic theory of translation. An essay in applied linguistics. London: Oxford University Press, 1965.
  26. Cinque M. Tuning Journal for Higher Education. 2016. Vol. 3. Pp. 389-427.
  27. Van Dijk T. A., Kintsch W. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press, 1983. Pp. 1-19.
  28. Fillmore Ch., Diltey V. Voprosy Philosophii. 2001. Vol. 9. Pp. 124-125.
  29. Lederer M. La traduction simultanee. Experiance et theorie. Paris, 1981.
  30. Macmillan dictionary. URL: https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/system.
  31. Ricœur P. The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1969.
  32. Shapiro M. The sense of grammar: Language as semeiotic. Bloomington, 1983. Pp. 10-11.
  33. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. National University of Malaysia. URL: https://www.ukm.my/portal/wp-content/postgraduate/handbook/PG_Handbook_Oct_2017.pdf.

© 2014-2023 Liberal Arts in Russia