Liberal Arts in Russia EN-rus logo
russian flagRussian
ISSN 2305-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2312-6442 (Online)
Current Issue
Поиск
2024
No. 1
2023
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2022
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2021
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2020
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2019
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2018
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2017
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2016
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2015
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2014
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2013
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2012
No. 1

Cognitive aspects of the development of the informational educational environment in higher education in the era of digitization

Liberal Arts in Russia. 2020. Vol. 9. No. 2. Pp. 123-132.
Get the full text (Russian)
License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
https://doi.org/10.15643/libartrus-2020.2.4
Belogash M. A.
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
49 Leningradsky Avenue, 125993 (GSP-3) Moscow, Russia
Email: mbelogash@fa.ru
Melnichuk M. V.
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
49 Leningradsky Avenue, 125993 (GSP-3) Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The creation of systematically organized informational and methodological resources for providing training in the context of higher education digitalization is the subject of interdisciplinary research. The paper aims to study the dependence of learning outcomes in a digital educational environment on factors such as the dominant intellectual modality, digital intelligence, educational paradigms, teaching tools, meeting educational needs, and a technologically comfortable environment. The authors take an integrated approach to study the issue of training autonomy, its dependence on the level of formation of the optimal patterns of students’ cognitive behavior, on the cognitive load increase in the process of self-regulatory learning, and on the skills of metacognitive self-instruction for regulating cognitive processes. The authors conclude that in building the information and educational environment, it is necessary to take into account the assessment of the cognitive potential of the educational capabilities of students. Another conclusion is that the informational architecture of the informative content should perform the function of an external trigger of internal motives to develop sustainable models of students’ cognitive behavior.

Keywords

  • • digital intelligence
  • • self-regulatory learning
  • • cognitive habits
  • • verbal-linguistic intelligence
  • • digital educational content

References

  1. Hattie J. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge, 2009.
  2. Neisser U., Boodoo G., Bouchard T. J. J., Boykin A. W., Brody N., Ceci S. J. American Psychologist. 1996. Vol. 51. Pp. 77-101.
  3. Gardner H. Multiple Intelligences: New Horizons in Theory and Practice. Basic Books, 2006.
  4. Park Y. IQ, EQ, and DQ. DQ Global Standards Report 2019. DQ Institute 2019. URL: https://www.dqinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/DQGlobalStandardsReport2019.pdf.
  5. Chirikov I., Smirnov I. Lozhnyi tsifrovoi sled: 5 vyzovov dlya iskusstvennogo intellekta v vysshem obrazovanii. URL: http://www.edutainme.ru/post/5-vyzovov-dlya-iskusstvennogo-intellekta/.
  6. Liaw S. Computers in Human Behavior. 2007. Vol. 23. No. 1. Pp. 399-414.
  7. Picccoli G., Ahmad R., Ives B. MIS Quarterly. 2001. Vol. 25. No. 4. Pp. 401-426.
  8. Arbaugh J. B. The Journal of High Technology Management Research. 2002. Vol. 13. No. 2. Pp. 203-233.
  9. Asoodar M., Vaezi S., Izanloo B. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016. Vol. 63. Pp. 704-716.
  10. Saks K., Leijen A. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013. International Conference on Education & Educational Psychology 2013. Pp. 190-198.
  11. Brockett R. G., Hiemstra R. Self-Direction in Adult Learning: Perspectives on Theory, Research, and Practice. London: Routledge, 1991.
  12. Pintrich P. R. Handbook of self-regulation. Ed. M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, M. Zeidner. San Diego, CA: Academic, 2005. Pp. 451-502.
  13. Loyens S. M. M., Magda J., Rikers R. M. J. P. Educational Psychology Review. 2008. Vol. 20. No. 4. Dec. Pp. 411-427.
  14. Yasmin M., Naseem F., Masso I. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 2019. Vol. 61. Pp. 34-40.
  15. Soma S., Suematsu N., Yoshida J., Rios A., Shimegi S. Behavioral Processes. 2018. Vol. 157. Pp. 291-300.
  16. Liu A., Li T. M. Procedia CIRP. 2016. The 10th International Conference on Axiomatic Design, ICAD 2016. Pp. 119-124.
  17. Zimmerman B. Theory into Practice. 2002. Vol. 41. Pp. 64-70.
  18. Boekaerts M., Schunk D. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York: Routledge, 2011. Pp. 408-425.
  19. Seufert T. Educational Research Review. 2018. Vol. 24. Pp. 116-129.
  20. Sweller J., Ayres P., Kalyuga S. Cognitive Load Theory. New York: Springer, 2011. Vol. 1.
  21. Plass J., Moreno R., Brunken R. Introduction. Cognitive load theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Pp. 1-6.
  22. Veenman M. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. 2015. Pp. 89-95.
  23. Wiley J., Jee B. Overview and Recent Trends. International Encyclopedia of Education. 3rd ed. 2010. Pp. 245-250.

© 2014-2023 Liberal Arts in Russia