Liberal Arts in Russia EN-rus logo
russian flagRussian
ISSN 2305-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2312-6442 (Online)
Current Issue
Поиск
2024
No. 1
2023
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2022
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2021
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2020
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2019
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2018
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2017
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2016
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2015
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2014
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2013
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2012
No. 1

Linguistic norm in post-non-classical studies and the runaway world theory

Liberal Arts in Russia. 2018. Vol. 7. No. 1. Pp. 11-19.
Get the full text (Russian)
License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
https://doi.org/10.15643/libartrus-2018.1.2
Kartushina E. A.
Pushkin State Russian Language Institute
6 Volgin Street, 117485 Moscow, Russia
Email: eakartushina@gmail.com

Abstract

The article devoted to the study of elaborate correlation between language and ideology, language and culture. The author dwells on the shift in the key concept of social and humanitarian studies from a classical standard and language description to the flexibility in the language use and functioning. It is necessary to point out though that despite some similarities in correlation between language and culture on the one side and language and ideology on the other side, there are some differences in the pragmatic perspectives between these categories. The discourse that has been formed under the ideological influence tends to be formal and ritualized to a greater extent than those language structures that have been developed due to culturally consistent processes i.e. connection and transmission between the generations. The author also makes an attempt to apply the paradox of globalization by A. Giddens to social linguistics. The runaway world theory introduced by a British sociologist A. Giddens singles out that the globalizing world does not become predictable as globalization predominates, but, on the contrary, social and linguistic processes become less and less manageable. The understanding of language and society becomes more complicated and demands new doctrines and innovative concepts, such as post-non-classical paradigm might conjure in. The author also takes into account the causes making standard language too flexible and changeable. The main cause of this process is an intent conditioned by certain communicative situation or by certain reasons to alter illocution of the utterances for representing identity, resulting in turn to more prestigious or more sophisticated language.

Keywords

  • • sociolinguistics
  • • post-neoclassicism
  • • linguistic norm
  • • language and ideology
  • • language and globalization
  • • language and culture

References

  1. Alpatov V. M. Profil' yazyka: sotsiolingvistika, natsional'noe var'irovanie, perevodovedenie, kontrastnaya stilistika: Sb. trudov k 90-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya A. D. Shveitsera. Moscow, 2015. Pp. 21-29.
  2. Bogdanova-Beglaryan N. V. Verkhenevolzhskii filologicheskii vestnik. 2015. No. 1. Pp. 25-30.
  3. Belikov V. I. Aktual'nye voprosy teoreticheskoi i prikladnoi fonetiki: Sb. statei k yubileyu O. F. Krivnovoi. Moscow, 2013. Pp. 465-466.
  4. Valentii T. V. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 21: Upravlenie (gosudarstvo i obshchestvo). 2005. No. 2. Pp. 78-87.
  5. Vereshchagin E. M., Kostomarov V. G. Yazyk i kul'tura: lingvostranovedenie v prepodavanii russkogo yazyka kak inostrannogo: Metodicheskoe rukovodstvo. 4 ed. [Language and culture: Linguistic country studies in teaching Russian as a foreign language: Methodological guidance. 4th edition]. Moscow: Russkii yazyk, 1990.
  6. Gurevich P. S. Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2015. No. 1. Pp. 7-11.
  7. Dokuchaeva R. M. 23-ya godichnaya sessiya Uchenogo soveta Syktyvkarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. P. Sorokina (Fevral'skie chteniya): Sbornik materialov. Pp. 270-273.
  8. Zagorskaya O. V. Izvestiya Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2016. Vol. 2. No. 2(271). Pp. 159-167.
  9. Ivanova N. S. Teoriya i praktika inostrannogo yazyka v vysshei shkole. 2016. No. 12. Pp. 61-69.
  10. Kapusheva A. M. Gumanitarnye i yuridicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. No. 3. Pp. 189-195.
  11. Kirilina A. V. Gorizonty sovremennoi lingvistiki: traditsii i novatorstvo: Sb. v chest' E. S. Kubryakovoi. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur, 2009. Pp. 65-75.
  12. Krongauz M. A. Slovo za slovo. O yazyke i ne tol'ko [Word by word. Talking about language and other matters]. Moscow: Delo RANKhiGS, 2015.
  13. Krysin L. P. Russkii yazyk v shkole. 2008. No. 7. Pp. 77-80.
  14. Laletina A. O. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2011. Vol. 153. No. 6. Pp. 219-226.
  15. Mozheiko M. A. Filosofiya nauki. 2016. No. 7. Pp. 80-95.
  16. Oparina E. O. Chelovek: obraz, sushchnost'. 2017. No. 1-2. Pp. 173-184.
  17. Skachkova I. N. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2015. No. 2(97). Pp. 98-104.
  18. Skorokhodova V. Yu. Uchenye zapiski Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial'nogo universiteta. 2008. No. 4(60). Pp. 252-262.
  19. Stepin V. S. Voprosy filosofii. 2003. No. 8. Pp. 5-8.
  20. Sytsina-Kudryavtseva A. N. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universitete. Seriya: Russkaya filologiya. 2011. No. 2. Pp. 92-98.
  21. Ter-Minasova S. G. Yazyk i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya [Language and intercultural communication]. Moscow: Slovo, 2009.
  22. Shabaeva T. N. Voprosy natsionalizma. 2016. No. 2(26). Pp. 95-99.
  23. Shtain K. E., Petrenko D. I. Yazyk. Yazykoznanie. Ideologiya: ot sotsializma k rossiiskomu kapitalizmu. Rostov n/D.
  24. Chebotnikova T. A. Aktual'nye problemy sovremennoi nauki: Mat-ly mezhdunarodnykh nauchno-prakticheskikh konferentsii nauchnoi sessii. XVII Nevskie chteniya. 2016. Pp. 75-79.
  25. Giddens A. Taylor and Francis. 2003.

© 2014-2023 Liberal Arts in Russia