Liberal Arts in Russia EN-rus logo
russian flagRussian
ISSN 2305-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2312-6442 (Online)
Current Issue
Поиск
2024
No. 3No. 2No. 1
2023
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2022
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2021
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2020
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2019
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2018
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2017
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2016
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2015
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2014
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2013
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2012
No. 1

The relation of educational success with the psychological characteristics of 4-7 grade students (longitudinal study)

Liberal Arts in Russia. 2017. Vol. 6. No. 5. Pp. 404-408.
Get the full text (Russian)
License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
https://doi.org/10.15643/libartrus-2017.5.5
Nikolaeva E. I.
Herzen State Pedagogical University
48 Moika River Embankment, 191186 Saint Petersburg, Russia
Email: klemtina@yandex.ru
Strekosova V. S.
Herzen State Pedagogical University
48 Moika River Embankment, 191186 Saint Petersburg, Russia
Zinovjeva I. I.
“Lyceum” of Balashikha; School Intellect-Service
55 Lenin Avenue, 143907 Balashikha, Russia; 6 Granichnaya Street, 143980 Zheleznodorozhny, Russia

Abstract

27 students were studied during four years. The results of the psychological study of intelligence and motivation for learning have been associated with the success of learning. It was shown that the level of motivation falls from 4th to 7th grade, and the fall is more prominent for students having a higher level of motivation. In grade 4, the children with a higher level of motivation for learning earn higher marks in the subjects related to a cognitive interest (math, literature, biology, geography). In grade 5, educational performance falls for all students. In grade 7, the difference in marks of students with higher and lower motivation for learning is leveled. Intelligence is connected with success of learning for different subjects in grades 4 and 5. In grade 7, there is no relation between marks and intelligence.

Keywords

  • • motivation
  • • learning
  • • intelligence
  • • success in learning
  • • pupils

References

  1. Badmaeva N. Ts. Voprosy psikhologii. 2012. No. 6. Pp. 14.
  2. Bozhovich L. I. Lichnost' i ee formirovanie v det-skom vozraste [Personality and its formation in childhood]. Moscow: Rol'f, 2010.
  3. Borisova E. M., Loginova G. P. Voprosy psikhologii. 1986. No. 2. Pp. 2-21.
  4. Gordeeva T. O. Motivatsiya uchebnoi deyatel'nosti shkol'nikov i studentov: struktura, mekhanizmy, usloviya razvitiya: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra psikh. nauk. Moscow, 2013.
  5. Istratova O. N., Eksakusto T. V. Spravochnik psikhologa srednei shkoly [Handbook of secondary school psychologist]. Rostov n/D: Feniks, 2003.
  6. Merenkova V. S., Nikolaeva E. I. Psikhologiya obrazovaniya v polikul'turnom prostranstve. 2010. Vol. 3. No. 3. Pp. 53-60.
  7. Novikova M. A., Kornilova T. V. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2012. Vol. 5. No. 23. Pp. 2-10.
  8. Nikolaeva E. I., Vergunov E. G. Psikhologiya obrazovaniya v polikul'turnom prostranstve. 2013. Vol. 1. No. 21. Pp. 47-52.
  9. Piaget J. Psikhologiya intellekta [Psychology of intelligence]. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2003.
  10. Poretskova G. Yu. Prakticheskaya meditsina. 2016. No. 8(100). Pp. 83-86.
  11. Reshetnikov O. V. Pedagogicheskaya tekhnologiya otsenki uchitelem lichnostnogo razvitiya shkol'nikov v obrazovatel'nom protsesse: avtoref. dis. ... kand. ped. nauk. Moscow, 2003.
  12. Rukovodstvo k primeneniyu gruppovogo intellektual'nogo testa (GIT) dlya mladshikh podrostkov [Guidelines for application of the group intellectual test (GIT) for younger adolescents]. Moscow, 1993.
  13. Fedorov B. I. Filosofskie nauki. 2010. No. 2. Pp. 124-139.
  14. Breen R., Goldthorpe J. H. Br. J. Sociol. 2012. Vol. 53. Pp. 575-582.
  15. Burks S. V., Carpenter J. P., Goette L., Rustichini A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009. Vol. 106. Pp. 7745-7750.
  16. Deary I. J. Intelligence. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2012. Vol. 63. Pp. 453-482.
  17. Duckworth A. L., Quinn P. D., Lynam D. R., Loeber R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011. Vol. 108. Pp. 7716-7720.
  18. Duckworth A. L., Seligman M. E. P. Psychol. Sci. 2005. Vol. 16. Pp. 939-944.
  19. Johnson W., Gow A. J., Corley J., Starr J. M., Deary I. J. Intelligence. 2010. Vol. 38. Pp. 402-411.
  20. Nettle D. Br. J. Psychol. 2003. Vol. 94. Pp. 551-561.
  21. Saunders P. Br. J. Sociol. 2002. Vol. 53. Pp. 559-574.

© 2014-2023 Liberal Arts in Russia