Liberal Arts in Russia EN-rus logo
russian flagRussian
ISSN 2305-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2312-6442 (Online)
Current Issue
Поиск
2024
No. 1
2023
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2022
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2021
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2020
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2019
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2018
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2017
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2016
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2015
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2014
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2013
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2012
No. 1

Characteristics of inexpressibleness for functional-semantic category

Liberal Arts in Russia. 2017. Vol. 6. No. 2. Pp. 174-181.
Get the full text (Russian)
License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
https://doi.org/10.15643/libartrus-2017.2.7
Mikhailova M. Yu.
Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education
65/67 M. Gorky Street, 443099 Samara, Russia
Email: marinamikhailova44@gmail.com

Abstract

The characteristics of the meaning of inexpressible is given in the article. It is shown that in the Russian language semantics of inexpressible is represented as a binary functional-semantic category. It was determined that the nuances of semantics of inexpressible can be represented in the form of a gradational scale on which they are distributed within the opposition “complete inexpressibleness - complete expressibility”. The components of the situation of inexpressibleness inherent the means of transference of the value of inexpressible are described. It is shown that the definition of the components of situation of inexpressible contribute to the modeling of the field of semantics of inexpressible: what the concept of inexpressible means, in which situations semantics of inexpressible manifests itself; for whom this situation arises, how it is solved, can it be solved; by what means of language, speech and other semiotic systems it is expressed. It is determined that the situation of inexpressible includes seven components: the subject of speech inexpressibleness; an action that is impossible to express the statement; inexpressibility result of the process; objectivity of the situation described; reasons of inexpressibleness; the object of this situation; spatial area of the situation of inexpressibleness. It is shown that the central part of the functional-semantic field model components number 2, 3 and 4. The private values of the field of semantics of inexpressible were described for the first time. The definition of gradation nuances of inexpressibleness considering the paradigmatic and syntagmatic aspects of the study of the semantics were carried out for the first time.

Keywords

  • • semantics of inexpressible
  • • functional-semantic category
  • • functional grammar
  • • modeling of semantic field

References

  1. Abramova V. I. Motiv "nevyrazimogo" v russkoi romanticheskoi kartine mira: ot V. A. Zhukovskogo k K. K. Sluchevskomu: dis. ... kand. filol. n. Moscow, 2007.
  2. Belyi A. Sochineniya v 2-kh t. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1990. Vol. 1.
  3. Blok A. Sobranie sochinenii: v 6-ti t. [Collected works: in 6 volumes]. Leningrad: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1980-1987.
  4. Gak V. G. Sokrovennye smysly: Slovo. Tekst. Kul'tura: Sb. st. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2004. Pp. 489-496.
  5. Gippius Z. Nebesnye slova. Styd. Sumasshedshaya. Sochineniya. Stikhotvoreniya. Proza [Words from the Heavens. Shame. Madwoman. Works. Poems. Prose]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1991.
  6. Gippius Z. Zhivye litsa. Moi drug. O Bloke [The living faces. My friend. About Blok]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1991.
  7. Esenin S. A. Sobranie sochinenii v 2-kh t. Stikhotvoreniya. Proza. Stat'i. Pis'ma [Collected works in 2 volumes. Poems. Prose. Articles. Letters]. Moscow: Sovet-skaya Rossiya; Sovremennik, 1990.
  8. Zaika V. I. Ocherki po teorii khudozhestvennoi rechi [Essays on the theory of artistic speech]. Velikii Novgorod: Novg. gos. unt-t, 2006.
  9. Ibragimova V. L. Semanticheskie, grammaticheskie i kognitivnye kategorii yazyka: yubileinyi sb. v chest' prof. L. M. Vasil'eva. Ufa: Gilem, 2007. Pp. 14-17.
  10. Ivanyan E. P. Semantika umolchaniya i sredstva ee vyrazheniya v russkom yazyke [The semantics of reticence and the means of its expression in the Russian language]. 2 ed. Moscow: FLINTA, 2015.
  11. Lermontov M. Yu. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v 10 t. [Complete works in 10 volumes]. Moscow: Voskresen'e, 2000. Vol. 4.
  12. Mann Yu. V. Poetika russkogo romantizma. Moscow: AN SSSR, 1976.
  13. Nikolaeva T. M. Funktsii chastits v vyskazyvanii [Functions of particles in a statement]. Moscow: Nauka, 1985.
  14. Sintsov E. V. Priroda nevyrazimogo v iskusstve i kul'ture [The nature of the inexpressible in art and culture]. Kazan': Fәn, 2003.
  15. Syritsa G. S. Slavyanskie yazyki i kul'tury v sovremennom mire. Moscow: MGOU, 2009. Pp. 294-295.
  16. Syritsa G. S. Aktualizatsiya avtorskikh smyslov v khudozhestvennom tekste. Lingvopoeticheskii aspect [The actualization of the author's meaning in a literary text. Linguopoetic aspect]. Moscow: FLINTA, 2014.
  17. Tolstaya T. N. Izyum. Moscow: Podkova, 2002. Pp. 61-71.
  18. Fet A. A. Vesna na dvore. Sochineniya v 2-kh t. [Spring in the yard. Works in 2 volumes]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1987. Vol. 1.
  19. Chizhova E. Planeta gribov [The mushroom planet]. Moscow: AST, 2014.
  20. Etkind E. G. "Vnutrennii chelovek" i vneshnyaya rech': Ocherki psikhopoetiki russkoi literatury XVIII-XIX vv. ["Inner human" and outer speech: Essays of psychopoetics of Russian literature of the 18th-19th centuries.]. Moscow, 1998.
  21. Derrida Ja. Doctor honoris causa Universitatis Silesiensis. Katowice: Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, 1997.
  22. Kita M. Stylistyka KhI. 2002. Opole, 2002. Pp. 101-119.
  23. Lachmann R. Gøgøl: Exploring Absence. Bloomington: Slavica, 1999. Pp. 18-33.
  24. Mikhailova M. Yu. Chapter 7. Expression of inexpressible: time of globalization. Actual problems of the humanities: Monograph. Vienna: East West, 2016. Vol. 3. Pp. 69-83.

© 2014-2023 Liberal Arts in Russia