Liberal Arts in Russia EN-rus logo
russian flagRussian
ISSN 2305-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2312-6442 (Online)
Current Issue
Поиск
2024
No. 1
2023
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2022
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2021
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2020
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2019
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2018
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2017
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2016
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2015
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2014
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2013
No. 6No. 5No. 4No. 3No. 2No. 1
2012
No. 1

Pragmalinguistic aspect of the political discourse as means of formation values of the nation

Liberal Arts in Russia. 2017. Vol. 6. No. 1. Pp. 82-94.
Get the full text (Russian)
License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
https://doi.org/10.15643/libartrus-2017.1.7
Chikileva L. S.
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
23 Oleko Dundich Street, 123995 Moscow, Russia
Email: lchikileva@fa.ru

Abstract

The political media discourse and its pragmalinguistic peculiarities are analyzed in the paper. The choice of the subject matter for the analysis is determined by the interest to media communication. It is noted that the political discourse is one of the effective means of influence on the collective consciousness. Various definitions of the concept “discourse” are given; special attention is paid to the presidential discourse. Discourse as a communicative event taking place in a social context is based on pragmatic situations and is studied taking into account such factors as a communicative situation, the addresser and the addressee of speech, the content of the communication, the pragmatic meaning of language units. The author analyses compositional, stylistic, and lexico-grammatical means used to create a pragmatic effect in the annual New Year addresses of the President of Russia Vladimir Putin. The effectiveness of presidential discourse is achieved due to the choice of words with positive connotation, the use of repetition, use of personal and possessive pronouns in the first person plural, the use of parallel syntactic constructions, and the use of both formal and informal styles. The author concludes that pragmatic means are of great importance for media discourse studies and presidential public addresses play an important role in shaping the moral values of the nation.

Keywords

  • • media discourse
  • • pragmalinguistic aspect
  • • speech influence
  • • public address
  • • extralinguistic factors
  • • human values

References

  1. Dobrosklonskaya T. G. Medialingvistika. 2015. No. 1(6). Pp. 45-57. URL: http://medialing.spbu.ru/part10/.
  2. Koval'skaya L. G. Yazyk i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya. 2003. No. 1. Pp. 56-66.
  3. Kozhemyakin N. E. Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki. 2010. No. 12(83). Pp. 13-21.
  4. Mel'nik G. S. Zhurnalist-skii ezhegodnik. 2012. No. 1. Pp. 27-30.
  5. Mendzheritskaya E. O. Izvestiya Yuzhnogo federal'nogo universiteta. Seriya Filologicheskie nauki. 2011. No. 3. Pp. 54-60.
  6. Polonskii A. V. Sovremennyi diskurs-analiz. 2012. No. 6. Pp. 42-57. URL: http://discourseanalysis.org/ada6/st43.shtml.
  7. Solganik G. Ya. Vestnik Moskovskogo gos. un-ta. Seriya 10. Zhurnalistika. 2005. No. 2. Pp. 7-15.
  8. Samoilova A. D. Diskurs: K probleme opredeleniya ponyatiya. URL: http://rus-lang.isu.ru/education/discipline/philology/disrurs/material/material10/.
  9. Karamova A. A. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Lingvistika. 2013. Vol. 10. No. 2. Pp. 19-24.
  10. Nesterova N. G. Vestnik Tomskogo gos. un-ta. 2009. No. 318. Pp. 37-41.
  11. Tayupova O. I. Medialingvistika: problemy i perspektivy: Monografiya [Medialinguistics: problems and prospects: Monograph]. Ufa: RITs BashGU, 2016.
  12. Chicherina N. V. Mediatekst kak sredstvo formirovaniya mediagramotnosti u studentov yazykovykh fakul'tetov [Mediatext as means of formation of media literacy of students of linguistic faculties]. Moscow: Izd-vo LKI, 2008.
  13. Shchipitsina L. Yu. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki. 2009. No. 9. Pp. 233-239.
  14. Shemelina Yu. V. Lingvokognitivnye aspekty novostnykh tekstov: na materiale britanskoi kachestvennoi pressy: dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Arkhangel'sk, 2008.
  15. Busch B., Kelly-Holmes H. Language, discourse and borders in the Yugoslav successor states. Multilingual Matters, 2004. Pp. 1-13.
  16. Carton S. Defining Social Media. ClickZ. 2009. URL: http://www.clickz.com/defining-social-media-2/72139/.
  17. Crystal D. Internet Linguistics: A Student Guide. London: Routledge, 2011.
  18. Crystal D. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
  19. Meagher M. E. Text and discourse: traditional and cognitive-functional aspects of linguistic research. Ryazan'. 2002. Pp. 29-34.
  20. Muschard J. Text and discourse: traditional and cognitive-functional aspects of linguistic research. Ryazan'. 2002. Pp. 35-39.
  21. Kobrin N. V. Mediateksty tvittera v kognitivnom aspekte (na materiale angliiskogo yazyka): avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Moskva. MGU. 2016.
  22. Barrett T. Twitter a teaching and learning tool. The Curious Creative. 2008. URL: http://edte.ch/blog/2008/03/29/twitter-a-teaching-and-learning-tool/.
  23. Boyd D. Twitter: "pointless babble" or peripheral awareness + social grooming? 2009 URL: http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2009/08/16/twitter_pointle.html.
  24. Harrison S. Media Space 20+ Years of Mediated Life. Springer-Verlag London Limited, 2009.
  25. Herring S. C. A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet. 2007. URL: http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2007/761.
  26. Honeycutt C. Proceedings of the 42nd Hawai'i International Conference on System Sciences. LosAlamitos, CA: IEEEPress, 2009. Pp. 1-10.
  27. Donald J. Trump's New Year Greeting. URL: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump.
  28. Chikileva L. S. Ritoricheskii diskurs: kognitivno-pragmaticheskii i strukturno-stilisticheskii aspekty: Monografiya [Rhetorical discourse: cognitive-pragmatic and structural-stylistic aspects: Monograph]. Moscow: Flinta, 2005.
  29. Dijk T. A. van. What is Political Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam, 1998. URL: http://www.discourse-in-society.org.
  30. Dijk T. A. van. Discourse as Structure and Process. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London, 1997. Vol. 1. Pp. 1-34.
  31. Pavlova E. K. Politicheskii diskurs v global'nom kommunikativnom prostranstve (na materiale angliiskikh i russkikh tekstov): avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. M. MGU. 2010. URL: http://www.dissers.ru/avtoreferati-dissertatsii-filologiya/a166.php.
  32. Aleshina E. Yu. Liberal Arts in Russia. 2016. Vol. 5. No. 6. Pp. 590-600.
  33. Zheltukhina M. R. Komicheskoe v politicheskom diskurse kontsa XX veka. Russkie i nemetskie politiki: Monografiya [The comical in the political discourse of the late twentieth century. Russian and German politicians: Monograph]. Moscow: In-t yazykoznaniya RAN, 2000.
  34. Golubeva T. M. Yazykovaya manipulyatsiya v predvybornom diskurse: na materiale amerikanskogo varianta angliiskogo yazyka: dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Nizhnii Novgorod, 2009.
  35. Guseva O. A. Ritoriko-argumentativnye kharakteristiki politicheskogo diskursa: Na materiale prezident-skikh obrashchenii k natsii: dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Kaluga, 2006.
  36. Dem'yankov V. Z. Politicheskaya nauka. Politicheskii diskurs: Istoriya i sovremennye issledovaniya. Moscow: INION RAN, 2002. No. 3. Pp. 32-43.
  37. Egorova E. V., Osetrova O. I. Magiya INNO: novoe v issledovanii yazyka i metodiki ego prepodavaniya: materialy Vtoroi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (Moskva, 24-25 aprelya 2015 g.). Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet, 2015. Vol. 1. Pp. 157-161.
  38. Mikhaleva O. L. Politicheskii diskurs: Spetsifika manipulyativnogo vozdeistviya [Political discourse: Specificity of manipulative action]. Moscow: LIBROKOM, 2009.
  39. Nikitina K. V. Tekhnologiya rechevoi manipulyatsii v politicheskom diskurse SMI: avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Ufa, 2006.
  40. Chudinov A. P. Politicheskaya kommunikatsiya [Political communication]. Moscow: Flinta - Nauka, 2006.
  41. Shapochkin D. V. Politicheskii diskurs: kognitivnyi aspekt: monografiya [Political discourse: cognitive aspect: monograph]. Tyumen': Izd-vo TyumGU, 2012.
  42. Shevtsova V. M. Magiya INNO: novoe v issledovanii yazyka i metodiki ego prepodavaniya: materialy Vtoroi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (Moskva, 24-25 aprelya 2015 g.). Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet, 2015. Vol. 1. Pp. 482-486.
  43. Sheigal E. I. Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa: monografiya [Semiotics of political discourse: monograph]. Moscow:Volgograd: Peremena, 2000.
  44. Jioeva A. Fundamentals of Political English: An Advanced Course. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 2014.
  45. Chikileva L. S. Liberal Arts in Russia. 2013. Vol. 2. No. 1. Pp. 76-86.
  46. Chikileva L. S. Liberal Arts in Russia. 2016. Vol. 5. No. 2. Pp. 220-232.
  47. Chikileva L. S. Kognitivno-pragmaticheskie i kompozitsionno-stilisticheskie osobennosti publichnoi rechi: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra filol. nauk. Moscow: 2005.
  48. Chikileva L. S. Angliiskii yazyk dlya publichnykh vystuplenii. English for Public Speaking. 2 ed. Moscow: Yurait, 2016.
  49. Titova M. Yu. Vestnik molodykh uchenykh No. 03. Gorno-Altaisk: RIO GAGU, 2006. Pp. 53-62.
  50. Novogodnee obrashchenie V. V. Putina 31.12.2016. URL: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/53683.
  51. Putin's New Year Address 31.12.2016. URL: https://sputniknews.com/russia/201612311049160942-putin-new-year-address/.
  52. Novogodnee obrashchenie V. V. Putina 31.12.2015. URL: http://www.interfax.ru/russia/488136.
  53. Novogodnee obrashchenie V. V. Putina 31.12.2014. URL: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/51128.

© 2014-2023 Liberal Arts in Russia