Liberal Arts in Russia EN-rus logo
russian flagRussian
ISSN 2305-8420 (Print)
ISSN 2312-6442 (Online)
Current Issue

Search for Approaches to the Formation of an Adequate Image of Science in the Learning Process

Liberal Arts in Russia. 2013. Vol. 2. No. 3. Pp. 228-236.
Get the full text (Russian)
Vlasova S. V.
Murmansk State Technical University
13 Sportivnaya Street,183010, Murmansk, Russia
Email: vlasovasv@mstu.edu.ru

Abstract

Ideas used in the philosophy of science to describe the development of science (T. Kuhn, V. Stepin, K. Hübner) are analyzed in a context of their adaptation for educational purposes. It is shown that the most appropriate approach considers the science as a unique complex self-organizing system. This approach makes it possible to integrate any fruitful ideas from different models.

Keywords

  • • mechanisms of science development
  • • the uniqueness of science
  • • an adequate image of science
  • • scientific education

References

  1. Vlasova S. V. Nauka i nauchnoe obrazovanie (V svete filosofii nauki) [Science and Science Education (In the Light of Philosophy of Science)]. Murmansk: Izd-vo MGTU, 2006. 296 s.
  2. Vlasova S. V. Vestnik MGTU: trudy Murmanskogo gosu-darstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Vol. 7.
  3. No. 1. 2004. Pp. 96.
  4. Gusev S. S. Samoorganizatsiya v prirode i obshchestve. Saint Petersburg.: Nauka, 1994. 129 s.
  5. Katasonov V. N. Voprosy filosofii. 2002. No. 8. Pp. 151.
  6. Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsii [Structure of Scientific Revolutions]. Moscow: AST, 2002. 608 s.
  7. Nazaretyan A. P. Intellekt vo Vselennoi (Istoki stanovleniya i perspektivy) [Intelligence in the Universe (The Origins of Evolution and Prospects)]. Moscow: Nedra, 1991. 222 s.
  8. Prigozhin I. Konets opredelennosti. Vremya, khaos i novye zakony prirody [The End of Distinctness. Time, Chaos and the New Laws of Nature]. Izhevsk: Regulyarnaya i khaoti-cheskaya dinamika, 2001. 208 s.
  9. Pruzhinin B. I. Nauka v kul'ture. Moscow: Editorial URSS, p. 1998. 384 s.
  10. Voprosy filosofii. 2001. No. 6. P. 3.
  11. Stepin V. S. Teoreticheskoe znanie [Theoretical Knowledge ]. Moscow: Progress, 2000. 743 s.
  12. Stepin V. S. Kritika nauchnogo razuma Ed. K. Khyubner Moscow: IFRAN, 1994. 326 s.
  13. Stepin V.S. Filosofskaya antropologiya i filosofiya nauki [Philosophical Anthropology and Philosophy of Science]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1992. 191 s.
  14. Khyubner K. Kritika nauchnogo razuma [Critique of Scientific Reason]. Moscow: IFRAN, 1994. 326 s.